In State v. Storch (1993), 66 Ohio St.3d 280, 291, 1993 Ohio 38, 612 N.E.2d 305, however, the Supreme Court of Ohio stated that the admission of an out-of-court statement may violate the Ohio Confrontation Clause even though no federal confrontation violation exists. The court explained: We construe the right to confrontation contained in Section 10, Article I to require live testimony where reasonably possible. However, circumstances may exist where the evidence clearly indicates that a child may suffer significant emotional harm by being forced to testify in the actual presence of a person he or she is accusing of abuse. In such circumstances, the child may be considered unavailable for purposes of the Rules of Evidence and the out-of-court statements admitted without doing violence to Section 10, Article I. Storch at 293. The court in Storch also stated that a trial court should hold a pre-trial hearing to determine whether a child can provide live testimony. Id. at 293-294.