State v. Wooden

In State v. Wooden (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 23, 619 N.E.2d 1132, the court concluded that a tampering with evidence conviction based on a missing gun was not supported by the evidence. Id. at 27. The court stated that "many possibilities as to the whereabouts of the gun can be imagined, including the possibility that one of the other two suspects fled the scene with it in his possession." Id.