In Grenell v. State Civil Service Commission (Franklin County), 923 A.2d 533, 538 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007) the Court explained that capricious disregard exists "when the unsuccessful party below has presented 'overwhelming evidence' upon which the adjudicator could have reached a contrary conclusion, and the adjudicator has not satisfactorily addressed that evidence by resolving conflicts in the evidence or making credibility determinations that are essential with regard to the evidence." Id., 923 A.2d at 538.