In Patla v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 962 A.2d 724 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2008) the petition suffered from the same deficiency present in Deal. The claimant's petition objected to the Board's order denying him benefits because the Board's determinations "were not supported by the record, and that there is no legal basis for the Board's denial of his benefits." Patla, 962 A.2d at 726. The Court concluded that the claimant's petition did not address the issue complained of on appeal, willful misconduct, and did not identify any specific findings allegedly unsupported by the evidence, and, therefore, preserved no issues for appellate review. Id.