In Shaw v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 115 Pa. Commw. 61, 539 A.2d 1383 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1988), this Court found that SEPTA had reasonable suspicion to request that the claimant in that case, a bus driver, submit to a drug test pursuant to SEPTA's policy where he had a history of attendance problems and failed to report a work-related injury until several days after it occurred. In making this finding, the Court noted that SEPTA was "responsible for the safe transportation of thousands of people each day." Id. at 1385.