In Hanks v. Magnolia Petroleum Co., 24 S.W.2d 5, 6 (Tex. Comm'n App. 1930, judgm't adopted), the trial court found that the well completed by Hanks did not produce in paying quantities within the contemplation of the terms of the lease, and this Court upheld such finding, holding that there was no evidence showing that there were any facilities for marketing the gas or any near-by localities or industries which might have furnished a profitable market therefor. The Court went further and pointed out the complete failure of the evidence to show what the gas could have been sold for at any probable market, and that there was no evidence "tending to show that the well was situated in such proximity to any prospective market which would justify the construction of a pipe line for marketing same." In Hanks, the lessee drilled a successful well and then capped it. 24 S.W.2d at 5. The court held that there was no evidence that the well could produce in paying quantities because "the record is wholly devoid of evidence showing that there were any facilities for marketing the gas or any nearby localities or industries which might have furnished a profitable market therefor," and "no attempt was made to show what the gas could have been sold for at any probable market, nor was there any evidence tending to show that the well was situated in such proximity to any prospective market which would justify the construction of a pipe line for marketing same." Id. at 6.