In Llamas v. State, 12 S.W.3d 469, 471 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000), the error was the denial of a severance. The Court disagreed with the lower court's "determination that the record contained insufficient data to measure harm." Instead, we said, that was "not a case where the error defies harm analysis; everything in the court reporter's record is data from which a court can analyze harm. To judge the likelihood that harm occurred, appellate courts must consider everything in the record including all the evidence admitted at trial, the closing arguments, and, in this case, the jurors' comments during voir dire."