Raspberry v. State

In Raspberry v. State, 741 S.W.2d 191 (Tex.App. - Fort Worth 1987), the 2nd Court of Appeals held that the trial court did not err in overruling the defendant's motion for severance urged during the punishment phase, finding that: (1) the motion was not timely because it was not made before trial; (2) the defendant did not present sufficient evidence to support the motion; (3) the record did not show that the defendant was prejudiced by a conflict of interest. Raspberry, 741 S.W.2d at 199.