State v. Roland

In State v. Roland, 973 S.W.2d 665, 666 (Tex. 1998) the Court held, without discussing the jurisdictional issue, that neither due process nor article 46.03 section 4(d)(5) required releasing a person committed following an acquittal by reason of insanity when the trial court did not hold a hearing before the commitment order expired. The Court accordingly conclude that this appeal involves a civil matter over which we have jurisdiction.