In Yusuf Mohamad Excavation, Inc. v. Ringhaver Equipment Co., 793 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001), the Fifth District considered whether the delayed discovery doctrine would operate to delay the accrual of a cause of action for tortious interference with a business relationship and unfair and deceptive trade practice claims. The Fifth District held that Hearndon was intended to be limited to its unique facts. Relying upon Federal Insurance Co. v. Southwest Florida Retirement Center, 707 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 1998), the Fifth District applied the principles of statutory construction, and found that it was clear the Legislature did not intend for the doctrine to apply to all causes of action. To decide otherwise, the Fifth District reasoned, would require the court to write into the statute a delayed discovery rule even though the Legislature had not done so. See Yusuf Mohamad, 793 So. 2d at 1127.