Zander v. Ogihara

In Zander v. Ogihara, 213 Mich App 438, 444; 540 NW2d 702 (1995), the Court held that extrinsic or parol evidence must be clear and convincing to prove an alleged signature of a lost contract. In Zander, the defendant denied signing the lease in question, while the plaintiffs alleged that the defendant had signed the lease, and the plaintiffs offered no other parol or extrinsic evidence to corroborate their testimony.