Norgaard v. Nodak Mut. Ins. Co

Norgaard v. Nodak Mut. Ins. Co., 201 N.W.2d 871, 874 (N.D. 1972) involved an accidental shooting of an individual due to the unintentional discharge of a gun while the gun rested on the roof of a parked automobile. Id. The owner of the vehicle sued his automobile insurance company seeking indemnification. Id. The Court affirmed the district court's ruling that the accidental shooting did not arise out of the ownership, use, or maintenance of the vehicle and denied coverage. Id. at 872. In Norgaard, we held that the "causal relationship need not constitute a proximate cause, but on the other hand if an injury is directly caused by some independent or intervening cause it does not arise out of the use of an automobile." Id. at 875. The resulting liability must arise out of the "inherent nature" of the insured item. Id. at 874. The Court adopted the causal connection test for determining whether an automobile insurance company was liable under its policy for coverage for an accidental injury suffered as a "result of the ownership, maintenance or use of the automobile described herein." The insured used the roof of his vehicle as a gun rest and accidentally shot and killed a companion as the companion was alighting from the vehicle. Relying on court decisions interpreting the phrase, "arising out of," contained in insurance policies, the Court said, "the causal relationship need not constitute a proximate cause, but on the other hand if an injury is directly caused by some independent or intervening cause it does not arise out of the use of an automobile, notwithstanding there may have been some remote connection between the use of an automobile and the injury complained of." Id. at 875. The Court ruled, "'use', to result in liability on the part of the insurance carrier, must be such use as arises out of the inherent nature of the automobile." Id. at 874. The Court held the causal connection test was not satisfied in that case because "the automobile was being used merely as a bench rest for the rifle," which was not a "use" arising out of the inherent nature of the automobile. Id.