In Zaras v. City of Findley (1960), 112 Ohio App. 367, 16 O.O. 2d 306, 112 Ohio App. 367, 176 N.E. 2d 451, the Court of Appeals for Hancock County reviewed a case similar to the one at bar. The court held: "the owner of one of such buildings with a common wall may, with suitable notice and using due and proper care to prevent injury to the other property, remove his portion of such wall in order to conform his improvements to the changes brought about by time in the value and availability of the property." Id. at 368.