Harrison v. State
In Harrison v. State, 651 So. 2d 1134 (Ala. Crim. App. 1994), one juror had read an article about the defendant's case. Although it is not clear how many jurors had read the article, only one juror stated that he thought the article would affect his decision.
On subsequent questioning, however, the juror stated that the portion that bothered him was the fact that the defendant had fled the state.
The trial court noted that there was already evidence of that fact in the record. The trial court denied the defendant's motion for a mistrial.
Affirming that decision, the appellate court noted that the juror was "extensively questioned" and "that he stated many times that he could try the case impartially based on the evidence presented from the witness stand." Id. at 1137.