In Dunlap v. Jimmy GMC of Tucson, Inc., 136 Ariz. 338, 666 P.2d 83 (App. 1983), the Court noted that the defendant "not having asked for special verdicts . . . will not be heard to challenge the validity of the general verdict, the jury having been presented with ample evidence to sustain the award of damages on at least [one] count." Id. at 341-42, 666 P.2d at 86-87. The Court note that, in Dunlap, the Court placed on defense counsel "the burden of requesting special verdicts after a motion for a directed verdict has been denied." Id. at 341, 666 P.2d at 86.