McLaughlin v. Fahringer
In McLaughlin v. Fahringer, 150 Ariz. 274, 277, 723 P.2d 92, 95 (1986) the trial court considered whether the trial could proceed after the prosecutor had referred to potentially inadmissible evidence during her opening statement. Id. at 276, 723 P.2d at 94.
The trial court found it was necessary to hold evidentiary hearings on the issue before proceeding and declared a mistrial. Id.
The supreme court concluded that the trial court had not adequately considered alternatives such as a short recess to resolve the evidentiary issue and thus there was no manifest necessity to declare a mistrial. Id. at 277-78, 723 P.2d at 95-96.