State v. Everidge

In State v. Everidge, 188 Ariz. 46, 48, 932 P.2d 802, 804 (App. 1996), the defendant had a total of three prior convictions, none of which qualified as a historical prior under any enhancement provision other than subsection (d). In response to the state's argument that the defendant had two historical priors under subsection (d), the Court held that only one of his three prior convictions could be encompassed by that subsection, regardless of whether it was, as we stated, "the third conviction chronologically or not." 188 Ariz. at 48, 932 P.2d at 804.