”In Every Case” Meaning

In People v. Ferris (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 1272, the court's interpretation of the phrase "in every case" was not controlled by the fact that the cases were not formally consolidated, they retained separate numbers, and various administrative procedural details reflected the separate status of the cases--e.g., separate jury verdicts and probation reports in each case.

Rather, focusing on substance rather than form, the court viewed the phrase in a practical rather than technical way and considered it reasonably susceptible of an interpretation based on how the numerous charges in multiple cases were resolved.

Implicitly, the court reasoned that a single trial on all the charges would be the same regardless of whether the charges were alleged in one case or multiple cases.

In effect, therefore, the unified resolution of the charges consolidated the three technically separate cases into one for the purpose of restitution under sections 1202.4 and 1202.45.