Under the Colorado Liquor Code, 12-47-901(5), C.R.S. 1999, with exceptions not relevant here, a licensed retailer may not authorize or permit gambling on its premises. "Gambling," as used in this statute has the same meaning as "gambling" in the criminal code, see Brownlee v. State, 686 P.2d 1372 (Colo. App. 1984), and includes, inter alia, risking money or other things of value for gain contingent, in whole or part, upon the happening of a sporting event over which the person taking a risk has no control. See 18-10-102(2), C.R.S. 1999. However, any game, wager, or transaction which is incidental to a bona fide social relationship, is participated in only by natural persons, and in which no person is participating, directly or indirectly, in professional gambling, is excluded from the definition of gambling. See 18-10-102(2)(d), C.R.S. 1999. In order for a reviewing court to set aside a decision by an administrative agency, the decision must be clearly erroneous, without evidentiary support in the record, or contrary to law. Brownlee v. State, supra. Under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4), the appropriate consideration for an appellate court is whether there is sufficient evidentiary support for the decision rendered by the administrative tribunal. The appellate court is not bound by any determination made by the trial court, but reviews the issues presented to that court de novo. See City of Colorado Springs v. Givan, 897 P.2d 753 (Colo. 1995).