Field v. Kearns
In Field v. Kearns, 43 Conn. App. 265, 269-70, 682 A.2d 148, cert. denied, 239 Conn. 942, 684 A.2d 711 (1996), the Court explained that "in determining whether a proceeding is quasi-judicial . . . our review is not limited to the label of the proceeding, but includes a review of the proceeding itself.
The principal factors to be considered are whether the body has the power to:
(1) exercise judgment and discretion;
(2) hear and determine or to ascertain facts and decide;
(3) make binding orders and judgments;
(4) affect the personal or property rights of private persons;
(5) examine witnesses and hear the litigation of the issues on a hearing;
(6) enforce decisions or impose penalties. . . . Further, quasi- judicial is defined as the action, discretion, etc., of public administrative officers or bodies, who are required to investigate facts, or ascertain the existence of facts, hold hearings, weigh evidence, and draw conclusions from them, as a basis for their official action, and to exercise discretion of a judicial nature." Field v. Kearns, supra, 43 Conn. App. at 271-72.