In re Shamika F
In In re Shamika F., 256 Conn. 383, 402-403, 773 A.2d 347 (2001) the court required that the appeal be filed in response to a temporary custody order rather than at the time parental rights had been terminated. Id. at 385.
The order in that case was entered after a hearing for which a predicate ex parte order of custody in the department of children and families had been granted. Id. at 385-86.
It was the order entered after the hearing, not the ex parte order entered before the hearing, from which the appeal should have been brought.