In State v. Saia, 172 Conn. 37, 46, 372 A.2d 144 (1976), the Court held that we have no inflexible rule regarding the necessity of calling the attention of a witness to his prior inconsistent statement before offering extrinsic evidence about it. Rather, "the trial court is vested with a liberal discretion as to how the inquiry should be conducted in any given case." Id.