In State v. Small, 1 Conn. App. 584, 588, 474 A.2d 460, 474 A.2d 461 (1984), the Court found that an array of photographs was impermissibly suggestive where four of the photographs could have been eliminated because of the age and weight of the individuals shown and three of the remaining photographs could have been eliminated because each contained a name other than "Pete" or "Peter," which the witness had been told was the assailant's name, leaving only the single photograph of the defendant.