Case Dealing With Extreme Mental Disturbance Mitigating Factor
In Philmore v. State, 820 So. 2d 919, 936 (Fla. 2002), the defendant and his co-conspirator agreed to steal a car and kill the driver in order to carry out their plan to rob a bank.
The Court upheld the trial court's rejection of the "extreme mental or emotional disturbance" mitigating factor where "the facts and circumstances of the homicide indicated a coherent and well thought out plan which spanned over the course of two days," and the factor was not supported by the testimony of the defendant's expert witnesses. Id. (quoting sentencing order).