Brown v. Eastman Kodak Co

In Brown v. Eastman Kodak Co., 2000 Guam 30, the Court found "a pattern of inexcusable neglect," where an attorney did not defend against an initial motion for summary judgment even though he was the counsel hired, where the attorney gave repeated assurances to his client that his case was proceeding forward when it was not, and where the attorney claimed the need for additional preparation time when another lawyer worked on the case. Brown, 2000 Guam 30 P 21.