In Brent v. Staveris Development Corp., 7 Haw. App. 40, 45, 741 P.2d 722, 726 (1987), the Court encountered a similar situation. The appellant, a second mortgagee left with a deficiency judgment, argued on appeal that the lower court erred in reopening the bidding at the confirmation hearing instead of ordering "new notice and a new public auction, because the sale would have attracted more bidders and obtained a higher sale price." Brent, 7 Haw. App. at 45, 741 P.2d at 726.