Pickel v. Cornett

In Pickel v. Cornett, 285 Ky. 189, 147 S.W.2d 381 (1941) the former Court of Appeals noted that while the elements for obtaining a prescriptive easement were similar to those for obtaining a fee simple title to land by adverse possession, the former represented an incorporeal hereditament with a less stringent standard of use. A private passway may be acquired by prescriptive use although a right of way is not strictly a subject of continuous, exclusive, and adverse possession. It is sufficient if the use exercised by the owner of the dominant tenement is unobstructed, open, peaceable, continuous, and as of right for the prescribed statutory period . (Id. 285 Ky. at 191, 147 S.W.2d at 382.)