In Art Wood v. Wiseburg, 88 Md. App. 723, 596 A.2d 712 (1991), cert. denied, 325 Md. 397, 601 A.2d 130 (1992), the CRG made comments on a proposed plan, which essentially directed the developer to amend details of the proposed plan in specific ways. Art Wood, 88 Md. App. at 733. The Court held that the CRG's action was an appealable final action because the CRG "was not waiting for or seeking any 'additional information' before approving the plan. 88 Md. App. at 733. Instead, "all that remained for the CRG to do . . . was to review the amended Plan to make certain that the developer had indeed complied with the agencies' and the CRG's directives." 88 Md. App. at 733-34.