D’Angelo v. Cole – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In D'Angelo v. Cole (67 NY2d 65, 490 NE2d 819, 499 NYS2d 900 [1986]), the Court of Appeals held a village ordinance unconstitutional to the extent that a village could not recover the price of road improvement expenditures it made from a private road owner where the recoupment of such expenditures violated the General Municipal Law, which required a competitive bidding process.

This, held the court, was because General Municipal Law former § 103 required projects over $5,000, such as the project in question in that matter, to be submitted to competitive bidding.

The court held that where "competitive bidding is statutorily required, and the municipality fails to follow that procedure, the contract is completely, not partially, void" (id. at 70 ).

New York Appeal Case Brief Constitution Contracts Ordinance

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 60,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.