Kandov v. Gondal – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In Kandov v. Gondal, 11 A.D.3d 516, 783 N.Y.S.2d 57 [1st Dept. 2004], the Court held that the defendant was estopped from raising a claim of defective service because he failed to apprise the Department of Motor vehicles of his current address.

In Kandov, supra., the excuse proffered by the defendant for his default was that on the date of service he no longer resided at the address where service was made, which was the same address that was listed with the DMV.

New York Case Brief Claim Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)Vehicle

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 60,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.