Kerins v. Prudential Prop. & Cas – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In Kerins v. Prudential Prop. & Cas., 185 AD2d 403, 585 N.Y.S.2d 637 (3d Dept 1992), an arbitration was held between the defendant and a third party, and a provision in the master arbitration agreement governing the arbitration provided that "awards thereunder were for the purpose of the dispute submitted only and had no collateral estoppel effect." (185 AD2d at 403).

The plaintiff subsequently sued the defendant and asserted that the arbitration award collaterally estopped the defendant from contesting his claim.

The court found that the limiting provision was valid as against a non-party to the arbitration, and thus dismissed the part of the complaint alleging collateral estoppel.

New York Agreement Arbitration Case Brief Claim Collateral Estoppel Complaint Dismiss Estoppel Lawsuit Provision Third Party

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 50,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.