Matter of Titza v. Kelly – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In Matter of Titza v. Kelly (138 AD3d 498, 28 NYS3d 303 [2016]), the petitioner, a police officer, sought to annul the denial of his application for ADR benefits due to disabling strokes that he suffered.

The Appellate Division, First Department unanimously affirmed the lower court's judgment denying the petition, stating:

"The statutory presumption in petitioner's favor that his strokes were service related (General Municipal Law § 207-k) was rebutted by credible evidence that the etiology of his strokes was unknown, petitioner does not suffer from coronary artery disease, and there was no evidence of hypertension." (Matter of Titza, 138 AD3d at 498.)

New York Appellate Division Case Brief Evidence Judgment Lower Court Petitions Police Police Officer

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 50,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.