Matthius v. Platinum Estates, Inc – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In Matthius v. Platinum Estates, Inc. (74 AD3d 908, 903 NYS2d 477 [2d Dept 2010]), extrinsic evidence was admissible because the agreement contained a general provision requiring insurance.

"Therefore, evidence of the indemnification agreement, which contained specific provisions regarding the amount of insurance to be provided and the parties to be insured, was admissible to resolve these ambiguities." (Id. at 909.)

However, the court observed that the indemnification agreement also "did not vary, alter, or contradict any terms" of the other agreement and remained enforceable. (Id.)

New York Admissibility of Evidence Agreement Case Brief Evidence Extrinsic Evidence Insurance Provision

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 50,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.