Mohan v. Hollander – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In Mohan v. Hollander, 303 A.D.2d 473, 756 N.Y.S.2d 615 (2d Dept. 2003), the Second Department held that, where the facts set forth in the complaint alleged causes of action to recover damages for conversion and legal malpractice which were barred by the applicable three-year statute of limitations, and the fraud claims were "merely incidental to the conversion and legal malpractice claims" and "the only purpose they serve is to circumvent the three-year statute of limitations," the trial court properly granted defendants' motions to dismiss the amended complaint. (Id. at 474.)

New York Case Brief Complaint Damages Dismiss Fraud Legal Malpractice Malpractice Motion to Dismiss Motions Statute Statute of Limitations

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 50,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.