People v. Brol – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In People v. Brol (81 AD2d 739, 740, 438 NYS2d 424 [4th Dept1981]), before the Court was the issue of the competency of the evidence.

The appellate court held that "unless the test is taken within the two-hour time limit ... the results are not competent evidence and may not be received in evidence against the operator, and the operator's refusal to take the test is also admissible in court against him" (Brol at 740).

The appellate court went on to say that "but if the test's results are incompetent if the test is not administered within the two-hour limit, evidence of the refusal is similarly incompetent evidence against defendant unless obtained within two hours of the arrest." (Brol at 740 .)

New York Admissibility of Evidence Appellate Court Arrest Case Brief Competent Evidence Evidence

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 60,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.