Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type
Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type

Peters v. United Ref. Co. of Pa – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In Peters v. United Ref. Co. of Pa., 57 AD3d 1512, 869 N.Y.S.2d 712 (2008), plaintiff argued that a snow plow contractor had "negligently created or exacerbated a dangerous condition by piling mounds of snow on the perimeter of the property, which then melted and re-froze" (id. at 1512).

That Court was not persuaded and granted summary judgment dismissing the action based upon its finding that:

(1) the contract was for plowing, not snow removal; and (2) salting, sanding, or snow removal was to be done upon request only (see id. at 1512-1513).