Santoni v. Bertelsmann Property Inc – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In Santoni v. Bertelsmann Property Inc., 21 AD3d 712, 800 N.Y.S.2d 676(lst Dept 2005), the alleged cause of the accident was malfunctioning elevator doors.

The Santoni defendants met their burden on summary judgment by demonstrating inter alia that the building elevators were thoroughly inspected weekly and that 11 days prior to the incident a mandatory New York City Inspection was done and an "annual supervisor's" survey was performed 17 days prior to the incident.

The defendants therein had an expert who opined that the accident as described by the plaintiff could not have occurred as she indicated based upon the function of the mechanisms involved.

Thus it was held that the defendants "tendered evidentiary proof in admissible form' that they had no notice of nor did they create any defective condition." Id.

New York Accidents Admissibility of Evidence Case Brief Judgment Notice Summary Judgment

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 60,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.