Scaringe v. Holstein – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In Scaringe v. Holstein (103 AD2d 880, 477 N.Y.S.2d 903 [3rd Dept 1984]), the buyer of a used car sued the seller claiming breach of express warranty, a claim which requires the buyer's reliance upon the seller's warranties.

The claim was dismissed, because the buyer was found to be on notice that the car had a substantial transmission defect and could not be said to have reasonably relied on the seller's newspaper advertisement that the car was in "excellent condition."

Neither of these cases provide a basis for denying the Lornes leave to amend their complaint to allege claims under GBL §§ 349 and 350.

New York Case Brief Claim Complaint Dismiss Express Warranty Lawsuit Notice

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 60,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.