Whitney v. Quaker Chem. Corp – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In Whitney v. Quaker Chem. Corp. (90 NY2d 845, 683 NE2d 768, 660 NYS2d 862 [1997]), plaintiff's action was time-barred because he was "aware of the primary condition for which damages are sought" more than four years after:

(1) he made repeated trips to a local hospital and a center;

(2) the doctors' reports reflected a diagnosis that coolant exposure caused plaintiff's illness;

(3) plaintiff told an attending nurse that "the coolant is killing me";

(4) plaintiff filed a workers' compensation claim and Employer's Report of Injury/Illness forms, outlining the same symptoms and stating that the coolant exposure was at fault (id. at 847).

New York Case Brief Claim Damages Employer Injury Time Barred Workers' Compensation

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 60,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.