Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type
Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type

Whitney v. Quaker Chem. Corp – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In Whitney v. Quaker Chem. Corp. (90 NY2d 845, 683 NE2d 768, 660 NYS2d 862 [1997]), plaintiff's action was time-barred because he was "aware of the primary condition for which damages are sought" more than four years after:

(1) he made repeated trips to a local hospital and a center;

(2) the doctors' reports reflected a diagnosis that coolant exposure caused plaintiff's illness;

(3) plaintiff told an attending nurse that "the coolant is killing me";

(4) plaintiff filed a workers' compensation claim and Employer's Report of Injury/Illness forms, outlining the same symptoms and stating that the coolant exposure was at fault (id. at 847).