Winegrad v. NYU Med Center – Case Brief Summary (New York)

In Winegrad v. NYU Med Center, 64 NY2d 851, 853, 476 N.E.2d 642, 487 N.Y.S.2d 316 (1985), the Court held that "bare conclusory assertions" from the defendant doctors, denying that they deviated "from good and accepted medical practices," were insufficient to establish that a plaintiff's cause of action "has no merit so as to entitle defendants to summary judgment." (64 NY2d at 853.)

The Court of Appeals accordingly reversed a lower court decision granting summary judgment to the defendants. (Id.)

It did so notwithstanding the fact that the plaintiffs had submitted "only their Counsel's affidavit" in opposition to defendants' motion. (Id. at 852.)

New York Affidavit Appeal Case Brief Cause of Action Judgment Lower Court Motions Summary Judgment

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 50,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.