American State Bank v. Stoltz – Case Brief Summary (North Dakota)

In American State Bank v. Stoltz, 345 N.W.2d 365, 367 (N.D. 1984), the Court recognized this state's settled law that a supplementary proceeding in aid of execution is not a new or separate action, but is merely a proceeding in a pending action against a judgment debtor.

The Court said a supplementary proceeding was not an action on the judgment, but was a continuation of, and auxiliary to, the original action. Id.

The Court rejected a judgment debtor's claim the trial court lost personal jurisdiction over him when the judgment was entered.

North Dakota Case Brief Claim Debtor Judgment Jurisdiction Personal Jurisdiction Supplementary Proceeding

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 60,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.