Brown v. Allstate Insurance Co – Case Brief Summary (South Carolina)

In Brown v. Allstate Insurance Co., 344 S.C. 21, 542 S.E.2d 723 (S.C. 2001), the appellate court found that the trial court's admission of evidence of Brown's "non-prosecution for arson was irrelevant and inadmissible...." Id. at 725.

However, because the case was tried to the court, rather than to a jury, and there was no indication that the judge relied on the "incompetent evidence," the appellate court found the error harmless. Id. at 726.

That Brown was a non-jury trial is, of course, a fact of notable import. Indeed, it was that fact on which the Brown court relied in reaching its decision that the error was harmless.

South Carolina Admissibility of Evidence Appellate Court Arson Case Brief Competent Evidence Evidence Insurance Judge Jury Jury Trial Non-jury Trial

why use lawpipe ?

The largest case briefs database in the U.S (over 60,000 case briefs).
New case briefs and articles updated monthly edited by experts.
We do not use robots or any kind of artificial intelligence to generate content.
Our legal database contains only important rulings and decisions, to ensure efficient and faster legal research.
Our search engine recommends only highly relevant briefs or articles, bypassing the need to browse through hundreds (and sometimes thousands!) of Irrelevant search results.
Search from 2,000+ legal terms keyed to our case briefs and articles, For each term, we show you every case brief and article in our database that relates to that term.