Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type
Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type

People in Interest of M.K – Case Brief Summary (South Dakota)

In People in Interest of M.K., 466 N.W.2d 177, 178, 185 (S.D. 1991), social services removed a child from the custody of a mother, age 21, who was "borderline mentally retarded," because of concerns of her ability to care for the child. Id. at 178.

After social services worked with the mother for two years without significant improvement, it recommended terminating the mother's parental rights. Id. at 185.

The mother argued that, before terminating her parental rights, she "should have been afforded counseling through additional state programs; specifically, the Intensive Preventive Placement program (IPP) and Adult Foster Care." Id.

In rejecting the mother's argument, the Supreme Court of South Dakota explained that "there was no IPP counselor in her area," and "termination of parental rights is not conditioned upon exhaustion of every possible form of assistance." Id.