Motion for Directed Verdict Appeal In South Carolina
When reviewing the denial of a motion for directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict, this Court must employ the same standard as the trial court by viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. Steinke v. South Carolina Dep't of Labor, Licensing and Regulation, 336 S.C. 373, 520 S.E.2d 142 (1999); Welch v. Epstein, 342 S.C. 279, 536 S.E.2d 408 (S.C. Ct. App. 2000) (Shearouse Adv. Sh. No. 32 at 1).
The trial court must deny the motions when the evidence yields more than one inference or its inference is in doubt. Welch, supra.
This Court will reverse the trial court only when there is no evidence to support the ruling below. Creech v. South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Dep't, 328 S.C. 24, 491 S.E.2d 571 (1997).
When considering directed verdict and JNOV motions, neither the trial court nor the appellate court has authority to decide credibility issues or to resolve conflicts in the testimony or evidence. Welch, supra.
A motion for JNOV may be granted only if no reasonable jury could have reached the challenged verdict. Crossley v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 307 S.C. 354, 415 S.E.2d 393 (1992).
The jury's verdict will not be overturned if any evidence exists that sustains the factual findings implicit in its decision. Welch, supra.