Buck v. Johnson
In Buck v. Johnson, 495 S.W.2d 291 (Tex. Civ. App. 1973), a receiver was appointed by the court in a real estate development suit in August 24, 1972, and no appeal was taken. The appellant later sought to terminate the receivership, which motion was denied.
On appeal, appellant asserted fundamental errors concerning the appointment and continuation of a receiver. The court held that the appeal of the receiver's appointment was improper, reasoning that "When a trial court decides to appoint a receiver in a given case, the question to be decided from which the complaining party is allowed to appeal is whether the property in litigation should be taken into the custody of the court and administered by a receiver. In other words, the question is as to the propriety of having a receivership." Buck, 495 S.W.2d at 296.