In Dunkelburg v. State, 276 S.W.3d 503, 507 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref'd), the Court held that reasonable suspicion for DWI was shown when the officer testified that he stopped the appellant because he believed there was a "possibility" that the appellant was driving while intoxicated. The officer's dashboard video supported the officer's testimony that the appellant was weaving, crossed the lane divider at least once, and was slow to react to the officer's emergency lights. Id. The officer further testified that in his experience, intoxicated drivers are frequently encountered at that time of night and that his training showed that weaving is one of the clues that a driver is intoxicated. Id.