Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type
Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type

Dunn v. Bank-Tec S – Case Brief Summary (Texas)

In Dunn v. Bank-Tec S., 134 S.W.3d 315 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 2003, no pet.), the Amarillo Court of Appeals held that the plaintiff could authenticate a surveillance video introduced during his cross-examination by agreeing that he was the person filmed and by "describing the things he was doing in the video." Id. at 329.

The court concluded that Dunn's testimony "effectively supplied the predicate for the video's admission by revealing that its content was an accurate portrayal of the acts he was doing" and affirmed admission of the video. Id.