In Etchison v. State, 880 S.W.2d 191, 192-93 (Tex. App.--Texarkana 1994, no pet.), the defendant testified that he did not receive notice of the hearing because he was a transient. The defendant's bondsman testified that after he made bond he never saw the defendant again, and there was no evidence that the defendant ever tried to contact the court, the bondsman, or his attorney to determine the status of the case. Id. The reviewing court held the evidence was sufficient to establish that the defendant intentionally or knowingly engaged in a course of conduct designed to prevent his receiving notice. Id. at 193.