In Farah v. Mafrige & Kormanik, P.C., 927 S.W.2d 663 (Tex. App.--Houston 1st. Dist. 1996, no writ), the appellant contended that its bank agreed to provide financing as long as appellant maintained accounts with the bank and complied with terms and conditions of certain individual loan agreements and that the bank "obligated itself to make any future loans in response to a reasonable request" but failed to do so. 927 S.W.2d at 678. The Court found the bank's alleged agreement to lend money in the future "too indefinite to be independently enforceable because the agreement did not specify any of the material terms inherent in the individual contracts to lend money." Id.