Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type
Extended Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type

Hunt County v. Dallas, Garland & Northeastern R.R – Case Brief Summary (Texas)

In Hunt County v. Dallas, Garland & Northeastern R.R., No. 05-03-01587-CV, 2004 WL 1178609 (Tex. App.--Dallas May 28, 2004, no pet.), the Dallas court addressed the requisite nexus in a case involving road maintenance.

In that case, a road maintenance crew used motorized equipment to spread road-base material over the road in spots where the road material was thinning.

The crew also spread the material over the railroad tracks at a crossing, burying the tracks beneath about four inches of road-base material. Id.

Later in the afternoon, a train encountered the built-up road-base material, and the engine and lead car derailed. Id.

The Dallas court held that the railroad failed to establish the requisite nexus, asserting:

In this case, the County's use of the motor-driven equipment, driving it over the crossing while laying the road-base material is not what "actually caused" the derailment. Instead, the derailment was "actually caused" by a condition of the real property, the built-up road-base material, negligently created by the County. The motor-driven equipment did "no more than furnish the condition that made the injury possible."